By Sandeep Bhardwaj
One of the pernicious myths of Indian politics that refuses to die is the claim that Jawaharlal Nehru somehow “stole” India’s premiership from Vallabhbhai Patel. The most popular variant of the myth suggests that Mahatma Gandhi manipulated the 1946 internal elections of Congress to install Nehru as its head, even though Patel was more popular within the party and the country. Of course, this claim is patently false. Yet it is propagated time and again by news media, TV shows and even the BBC (which should know better).
Peddling anti-Nehru propaganda is undoubtedly politically profitable these days. But teaching the public that the founding fathers illegitimately captured power by manipulating elections is dangerous for Indian democracy. It also poisons the shared memory of the country’s independence and is, frankly, unpatriotic. Unfortunately, historians have not pushed back against the myth strongly enough. Below I lay out the historical context of Nehru’s ascension and the story of the 1946 elections.
Continue reading





